Significance: Held on
Jan. 30, it was the first general election in Iraq since the
US-led invasion. The purpose of the election was to choose
representatives for the Iraqi National Assembly, who would draft
the nation's permanent constitution, while serving as a
transitional government.
Shi'a Dominate the
Elections: The leading Shi'a political party garnered 48% of
the vote, while other Shi'a parties added another 15%, giving
Arab Shi'a Muslims about 63% of the seats in the National
Assembly. Arab Shi'a constitute about 65% of the Iraqi
population.
Very High Voter Turnout
Among Kurds: Kurds comprise 15-20% of the population, living
almost exclusivly in the Kurdistan region (white, outlined in
blue). Due to a disproportionately high turnout among Kurds,
they received about 27% of the seats in the National Assembly.
Despite being primarily Sunni Muslim, Kurds have co-existed much
better with Arab Shi'a in Iraq than Arab Sunnis, due to
longstanding conflict with the Sunni Ba'athist government before
the US invasion.
Arab Sunni Boycotts:
Arab Sunni leaders sternly discouraged and otherwise threatened
fellow Arab Sunnis from participating. The Sunni Ba'athist Party
had long dominated as the ruling class, but as a minority in the
country, Arab Sunnis would serve as the minority party in a
democratic Iraq. In which case, Arab Sunnis largely avoided
running for seats in the National Assembly or voting. As a
result, Arab Sunnis won a mere 2% of the seats, despite
comprising roughly 20% of the population.
Election-Related Violence:
Arab Sunnis escalated violence in the month (Jan 1-30) leading
up to the election. They promised to "wash the streets in blood"
if the election proceeded. The election did proceed as planned,
with about 44 deaths nationwide (about half of these in Baghdad)
at polling stations due to insurgent attacks, a far cry from the
carnage threatened by Arab Sunni groups such as Al-Qaeda in
Iraq.
(Timeline Continued Below)
Iraqi Transitional Government
Commences Rule (May 3): Elected during
the January elections as the first sovereign Iraqi government. It was
tasked with drafting the permanent Iraqi Constitution. The Shi'a members
of the new government dominated the process of creating the new
Constitution, causing Sunni members of the Constitution committee to
refrain from signing the document. However, the leading Sunni political
party did ratify the constitution, based upon promises of an amendment
to the document, where they would be given increased input. The
transitional government would govern Iraq until May 20, 2006, when it
was replaced by the first permanent Iraqi government, based on the
December '05 elections.
Battle of Al Qaim in Al Anbar
Province Resulting in US Withdrawal (May 8):
Al Qaim had become a sanctuary for foreign fighters entering from Syria.
The US determined it necessary to overtake the town to prevent the free
flow of foreign fighters. They successfully gained control of the town
from Sunni fighters, but quickly withdrew once they determined they did
not have sufficient strength to maintain possession.
Convoy Ambush in Hit in Al Anbar
Province (May 9): Private military
contractors were transporting military supplies to US forces NW of
Fallujah, but were descended upon by Sunni guerilla fighters, who killed
all 17 military contractors.
Haditha (Al Anbar Province) Captured
by US Troops in September after Heavy Losses in
August: On Aug. 1, US snipers were overrun by insurgents just
outside of Haditha, resulting in the death of all 6 in the small sniper
unit. Two days later, an amphibious assault vehicle hit a roadside bomb,
killing 15 out of 16 in the vehicle. The US and insurgents suffered
heavy losses during operations throughout the rest of the month in the
area, with insurgent losses being significantly higher. The US set out
to capture Haditha in September, just as it had done with Fallujah the
year before. A Fallujah-type battle was expected, but the town was
surprisingly taken without a bullet being fired. Some of the insurgents
involved in the sniper unit slaying were detained during the operation,
and were later found guilty by an Iraqi court and executed.
Saddam Hussein's First Hearing
(Oct 19): The first hearing is held in
the case against Saddam for charges such as war crimes and genocide, for
using chemical weapons against the Kurds in the north during the
Iran-Iraq War, and for violent oppression of Shi'a in the south in
response to their rebellions following the Gulf War. As the trial
progressed, Saddam would refuse to appear on multiple occassions, while
refusing to cooperate with questions from prosecuting attorneys in other
instances.
Operation Steel Curtain around Al
Qaim in Al Anbar Province (Nov 5): The
US and Iraqi security forces invaded small towns surrounding Al Qaim,
also being used as staging grounds for foreign jihadists entering from
Syria. They successfully took a number of small sanctuary towns, killing
139 (compared to 10 deaths suffered), but Al Qaim still remained in the
hands of the insurgents.
Just after the 2003 US invasion, this
westernmost province of Iraq was relatively peaceful, compared to much
of the country. Being a Sunni stronghold, the US began efforts to bring
it under coalition control after the invasion, stoking a Sunni
insurgency in the province that raged at a high intensity until late
2006. After the Sunni guerillas were driven out of Fallujah by US troops
in 2004, they organized throughout the rest of Al Anbar throughout 2005,
carrying out strikes against US targets.
Further Understanding:
Abu
Ghraib Prison Abuse Scandal
US military personnel carried out
shocking crimes of abuse, torture, rape and murder against those
detained in the Abu-Ghraib Prison, used by the US after the invasion.
The abuses were a clear violation of Geneva Convention, legally ratified
by the US. The media became aware of abuses in early 2004, disseminating
details as they surfaced. Twelve soldiers were convicted of charges in
connection to the Abu-Ghraib scandal, most receiving minor sentences in
trials carried out throughout 2005. No one has been tried for any of the
major crimes committed, including homocide, despite confirmation that
prisoners were murdered as a direct result of criminal behavior by US
personnel. High-ranking generals and even Secretary of Defense Don
Rumsfield were implicated, but never directly tied to the events at Abu-Ghraib.
(Timeline Continued Below)
Intensified Sunni Insurgency
Most Attacks Orchestrated by
Arab Sunnis Against Shi'a Muslims: Most of the insurgent
attacks were carried out by various sects of Arab Sunnis, such
as former Ba'athists loyal to Saddam, or foreign jihadists, such
as al-Zarqawi and his al-Qaeda in Iraq group. The Arab Shi'a
were the most common victims of these attacks. Attacks against
Iraqi security forces (one of the primary targets of insurgent
bombings) mostly killed Shi'a, who comprised the majority of the
newly-constructed Iraqi police/military. Sunnis also often
victimized large or small gatherings of Shi'a civilians. Attacks
were frequent in cities where there were large numbers of both
Shi'a and Sunni, such as Baghdad. Hundreds of U.S. soliders were
also killed (and thousands wounded) by such attacks.
al-Qaeda in Iraq: al-Zarqawi,
the leader of the Sunni jihadist group loyal to bin Laden,
declared all-out war against all Shi'a (even civilians) on Sept.
14. This day saw a dramatic rise in deaths in Baghdad, with over
150 killed and 500 wounded. al-Zarqawi would continue to claim
credit for many of the insurgent bombings until his death in
June of 2006.
Overall Increase in
Insurgent Attacks: Attacks increased by 29% in 2005 compared
to 2004. The number of suicide bomb attacks nearly quadrupled,
car bombs more than doubled, and roadside bombs nearly doubled.
Shi'a Muslims
Pacified: Shi'a insurgent activity had virtually grinded to
a halt in 2005, after multiple ongoing revolts in 2004. Despite
being continually targeted by Sunni insurgents, Shi'a leaders
admonished followers to refrain from revenge attacks, in order
to avoid inflaming a civila war. They desired to give the new
government a fair opportunity, especially since Arab Shi'a, long
the majority segment, yet sidelined due to Sunni hegemony, were
now the dominant force in the democratic system.
Iraqis Tire of US
Occupation: According to a December poll, 82-87% of Iraqis
opposed continued US occupation, a substantial change from
previous sentiment. According to the same polll, 47% of Iraqis
supported attacks against US troops.
Shi'a Turmoil
Severely Victimized by Sunni
Insurgency: In 2005, the insurgency became largely
Sunni-driven, as Shi'a Muslims had put away their arms and
placed their trust in the political system. Sunnis ratcheted up
the insurgency by dramatically increasing bombings, usually
targeting Shi'ites. Shi'a were admonished to avoid seeking
revenge, in order to prevent civil war, and give the new,
democratically-elected Iraqi government a chance to succeed. It
was in their favor, since as the majority in Iraq, Shi'a were
the dominant force in the nation's new political system.
Naturally, the Sunni saw this as well, and resorted to violence
to derail the democratic system, which was stacked against them
due to their minority status.
Shi'a Protest (Apr 9):
Tens of thousands of Shi’a demonstrate in Baghdad against
continued U.S. occupation.
August Civil Strife:
During the month of August, supporters of the cleric al-Sadr
came into conflict with members of the Supreme Council for the
Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI). SCIRI received financial aid
and support from Iran, and was accused of being an Iranian
proxy. The fighting tailed off by the end of the month.
2005 Casualties:
US Military Deaths: 846
US Military Wounded:
5944
Iraqi Security Force Deaths:
2713
Insurgent Attacks:
34,131 (29% increase from 2004).