Intersting --what do you have that shows the development of Islam from 622A.D. forward?

pretty cool site for the history impaired like me

Some correct facts would be nice. The Act of Union 1707 - England did not annex Scotland (nor Ireland for that matter), and Scotland was not "technically" part of England, (whatever that means). The act was to unite the Parliaments of Scotland and England. The countries already had a common monarch and were not at war. Ireland was not part of this Union as it was a subordinate to Great Britain.
Please get your facts right.

Hey you guys shouldn't complain about every little thing that is incorrect.Why don't you make your own interactive history map and let us complain about it.I truly believe this is packed with details and there shouldn't be complaints.Casey did an awesome job and though there may be a few things wrong there is nothing to get caught up on.I believe in nationalism,but not to the point of critisizing anything that is wrong.Casey used internationally accepted history to make this and not your nation's accepted history. So stop being jerks or leave.

@William: Getting the facts right is important when portraying history. And, many times what is \'accepted\' and what is true do not always agree, so it is very important to bring to light disagreements; otherwise, we perpetuate the legend and the myth and not the history.

@Steve: As you can see, being snarky doesn\'t win you supporters. While it may not have been your intention, your comment reads as a slap in the face to the author. Also, when bringing facts into question, providing links to credible source material goes a long way to support your opinion.

Venice did not become a vassal state of the Ottoman Empire in any time during her history.

this was really helpful for me

Very nice site, good job!

I've found only one mistake at first glance - Polish Interwar Period border should look like this: http://www.rymaszewski.iinet.net.au/images/polcut.jpg

Nevertheless, congratulations on awesome work!

Wow, England \"annexed\" Scottland huh? Is the author aware that the King of Scottland James VI BECAME James I of England? They were independent kingdoms governed by the same monarch; Scottland was never \"a part of England\". The maps are cool and everything is well written, but it makes me wonder what else is wrong. It seems there is a lot of bias in lot of the writing as well.